PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBSH vs. NFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBSH vs. NFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBSH achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than NFG's -2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CBSH has outperformed NFG with an annualized return of 8.88%, while NFG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.84% annualized return.


CBSH

1D
1.34%
1M
10.14%
YTD
7.79%
6M
4.98%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
8.88%

NFG

1D
0.98%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-4.55%
1Y
-5.57%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
6.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBSH vs. NFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBSH
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
7.79%-10.16%24.71%-15.91%5.56%11.44%3.71%28.74%7.52%3.07%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
-2.59%35.31%25.38%-17.71%1.87%60.66%-7.58%-5.94%-3.74%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CBSH and NFG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 1987

0.29

The correlation between CBSH and NFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBSH:

$8.14B

NFG:

$7.27B

EPS

CBSH:

$4.20

NFG:

$7.46

PE Ratio

CBSH:

13.28

NFG:

10.40

PEG Ratio

CBSH:

5.34

NFG:

0.08

PS Ratio

CBSH:

3.65

NFG:

7.22

PB Ratio

CBSH:

1.89

NFG:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBSH:

$2.10B

NFG:

$988.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBSH:

$1.31B

NFG:

$576.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBSH:

$614.94M

NFG:

$1.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBSH vs. NFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBSH
CBSH Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CBSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NFG
NFG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBSH vs. NFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBSHNFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.97

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.27

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

-0.58

+0.33

CBSH vs. NFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the NFG Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBSH and NFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBSH vs. NFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBSH drawdown since its inception was -44.70%, smaller than the maximum NFG drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSH and NFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBSHNFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.70%

-55.49%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.44%

-20.45%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.63%

-20.45%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.02%

-35.74%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.23%

-44.28%

+6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.49%

-19.20%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-14.34%

+5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.54%

9.67%

+4.87%

Volatility

CBSH vs. NFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) is 4.54%, while National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that CBSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBSHNFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

5.73%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

14.17%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.00%

19.83%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.32%

22.24%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

24.03%

+2.45%

Dividends

CBSH vs. NFG - Dividend Comparison

CBSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than NFG's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBSH
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
1.95%2.03%1.67%1.95%1.50%1.47%2.00%1.48%1.61%1.55%2.93%2.04%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
2.76%2.65%3.36%3.91%2.97%2.83%4.30%3.72%3.30%3.00%2.84%3.67%

Financials

CBSH vs. NFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commerce Bancshares, Inc. and National Fuel Gas Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M20222023202420252026
475.69M
-651.51M
(CBSH) Total Revenue
(NFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CBSH vs. NFG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Commerce Bancshares, Inc. and National Fuel Gas Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
46.2%
Portfolio components
CBSH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 475.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of -300.89M and revenue of -651.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.

CBSH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 475.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 347.14M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -53.3%.

CBSH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 141.62M and revenue of 475.69M, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.

NFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 247.67M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in a net margin of -38.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBSH and NFG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFG has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to CBSH (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSH dropped -44.70% vs NFG's -55.49%.

CBSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBSH and NFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer