NFG vs. MSA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA).

Performance

NFG vs. MSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NFG vs. MSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NFG National Fuel Gas Company	18.03%	35.31%	25.38%	-17.71%	1.87%	60.66%	-7.58%	-5.94%	-3.74%	-0.20%
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated	2.65%	-2.14%	-0.71%	18.52%	-3.15%	2.14%	19.79%	36.10%	23.61%	13.97%

Fundamentals

EPS NFG : $7.17 MSA : $10.63
PE Ratio NFG : 13.11 MSA : 15.42
PEG Ratio NFG : 0.10 MSA : 0.06
PS Ratio NFG : 3.63 MSA : 2.29
Total Revenue (TTM) NFG : $2.37B MSA : $1.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) NFG : $1.22B MSA : $871.11M
EBITDA (TTM) NFG : $1.51B MSA : $473.57M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFG achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than MSA's 2.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NFG has underperformed MSA with an annualized return of 10.01%, while MSA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.61% annualized return.

NFG

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 2.98%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: 21.45%
• 5Y*: 17.05%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

MSA

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -16.10%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: -4.15%
• 1Y: 13.16%
• 3Y*: 8.36%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NFG vs. MSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFG

NFG Risk / Return Rank: 70
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MSA

MSA Risk / Return Rank: 56
MSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MSA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MSA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFG vs. MSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFG	MSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	0.52	+0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	0.89	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.11	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	0.59	+0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	1.80	+1.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFG vs. MSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the MSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFG and MSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFG	MSA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	0.52	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.12	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.51	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.34	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between NFG and MSA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NFG vs. MSA - Dividend Comparison

NFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than MSA's 1.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NFG National Fuel Gas Company	2.28%	2.65%	3.36%	3.91%	2.97%	2.83%	4.30%	3.72%	3.30%	3.00%	2.84%	3.67%
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated	1.29%	1.31%	1.21%	1.11%	1.26%	1.16%	1.14%	1.30%	1.58%	1.78%	1.89%	2.92%

Drawdowns

NFG vs. MSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFG drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, smaller than the maximum MSA drawdown of -70.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFG and MSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFG	MSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.49%	-70.32%	+14.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.30%	-20.67%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.74%	-35.09%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.28%	-38.39%	-5.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-19.06%	+17.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-17.45%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.51%	6.76%	+0.75%

Volatility

NFG vs. MSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) is 5.89%, while MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that NFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFG	MSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	7.73%	-1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	18.26%	-4.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.98%	25.46%	-4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.03%	24.43%	-2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	28.73%	-4.72%

Financials

NFG vs. MSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between National Fuel Gas Company and MSA Safety Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of 300.89M and revenue of 651.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.

MSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 239.39M and revenue of 510.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.

NFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 276.12M and revenue of 651.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.

MSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 144.05M and revenue of 510.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

NFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 181.65M and revenue of 651.51M, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.

MSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 86.93M and revenue of 510.91M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.