CBRE vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 10 years, CBRE returned 17.17%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for LIT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CBRE vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRE achieves a -17.15% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 20.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CBRE has outperformed LIT with an annualized return of 17.17%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.22% annualized return.

CBRE

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: -17.15%
• 6M: -18.70%
• 1Y: -3.89%
• 3Y*: 20.98%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: 17.17%

LIT

• 1D: -5.01%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: 20.92%
• 6M: 17.98%
• 1Y: 114.29%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: 3.06%
• 10Y*: 14.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRE vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc.	-17.15%	22.47%	41.04%	20.96%	-29.08%	73.01%	2.33%	53.07%	-7.55%	37.54%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	20.92%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRE and LIT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between CBRE and LIT has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CBRE vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRE

CBRE Risk / Return Rank: 36
CBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 37

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 91
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRE vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBRE	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	3.35	-3.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	3.73	-3.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.49	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	6.98	-7.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.32	24.36	-24.67

CBRE vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRE Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRE and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBRE vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRE drawdown since its inception was -94.31%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRE and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBRE	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.31%	-65.91%	-28.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.37%	-16.46%	-10.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.37%	-53.01%	+25.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.38%	-65.91%	+25.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.57%	-65.91%	+12.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.38%	-15.46%	-6.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.57%	-33.56%	+6.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.31%	4.71%	+7.60%

Volatility

CBRE vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) is 8.75%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 11.76%. This indicates that CBRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBRE	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.75%	11.76%	-3.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.10%	24.39%	+1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.82%	34.30%	-3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.31%	32.09%	-1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.87%	30.75%	+2.12%

Dividends

CBRE vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

CBRE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.40%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBRE and LIT in my portfolio?

CBRE and LIT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBRE or LIT?

LIT has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to CBRE (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBRE dropped -94.31% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.