PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBRE vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
-16.36%22.47%41.04%20.96%-29.08%73.01%2.33%53.07%-7.55%37.54%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRE achieves a -16.36% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CBRE has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 16.54%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


CBRE

1D
-0.72%
1M
-7.23%
YTD
-16.36%
6M
-14.10%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
16.54%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBRE vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRE
CBRE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBRE^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

0.92

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.33

1.41

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.21

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.41

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.33

6.61

-6.28

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRE and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBRE^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

0.92

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.61

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.68

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.46

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between CBRE and ^GSPC is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRE drawdown since its inception was -94.31%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRE and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBRE^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.31%

-56.78%

-37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.22%

-12.14%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.38%

-25.43%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.57%

-33.92%

-19.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.63%

-5.78%

-15.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-10.75%

-15.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.60%

2.60%

+6.00%

Volatility

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that CBRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBRE^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

5.37%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.29%

9.55%

+14.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.09%

18.33%

+13.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.99%

16.90%

+13.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.93%

18.05%

+14.88%