PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBRE vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRE achieves a -17.15% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CBRE has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 17.17%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.71% annualized return.


CBRE

1D
2.51%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-17.15%
6M
-18.70%
1Y
-3.89%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
17.17%

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
-17.15%22.47%41.04%20.96%-29.08%73.01%2.33%53.07%-7.55%37.54%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRE and ^GSPC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2004

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between CBRE and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBRE vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRE
CBRE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBRE^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.32

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.46

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.32

10.92

-11.23

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRE Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRE and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRE drawdown since its inception was -94.31%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRE and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBRE^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.31%

-56.78%

-37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.37%

-9.10%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.37%

-18.90%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.38%

-25.43%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.57%

-33.92%

-19.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.38%

-3.21%

-19.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.57%

-10.71%

-15.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.31%

2.04%

+10.27%

Volatility

CBRE vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that CBRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBRE^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.75%

4.89%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.10%

9.93%

+16.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.82%

12.57%

+18.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.31%

17.00%

+13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.87%

18.08%

+14.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBRE and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBRE has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBRE dropped -94.31% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBRE and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer