CBON vs. SMHX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) and SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBON is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while SMHX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CBON returned 8.97% vs 131.85% for SMHX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBON charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMHX.

Performance

CBON vs. SMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBON achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than SMHX's 74.81% return.

CBON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 5.41%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 8.97%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: 2.03%
• 10Y*: 2.92%

SMHX

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: 27.33%
• YTD: 74.81%
• 6M: 68.22%
• 1Y: 131.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBON vs. SMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	5.41%	5.46%	-0.66%
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	74.81%	30.00%	17.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CBON and SMHX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024	0.11

CBON vs. SMHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CBON	SMHX
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CBON vs. SMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBON

CBON Risk / Return Rank: 89
CBON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CBON Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CBON Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CBON Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CBON Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SMHX

SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 92
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBON vs. SMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBON	SMHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	4.06	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	4.32	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.56	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.72	7.78	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.03	21.87	+3.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBON vs. SMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBON Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is lower than the SMHX Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBON and SMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBON	SMHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	4.06	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.89	-1.46

Drawdowns

CBON vs. SMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBON drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum SMHX drawdown of -38.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBON and SMHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBON	SMHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-38.53%	+24.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.34%	-17.06%	+15.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-2.03%	+2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-7.32%	+3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	6.05%	-5.69%

Volatility

CBON vs. SMHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) is 0.91%, while VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a volatility of 12.19%. This indicates that CBON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBON	SMHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	12.19%	-11.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	25.18%	-22.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	32.71%	-29.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.92%	39.96%	-35.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.58%	39.96%	-34.38%

CBON vs. SMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBON has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMHX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBON vs. SMHX - Dividend Comparison

CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than SMHX's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	1.52%	1.66%	2.15%	3.01%	2.70%	3.05%	2.87%	3.87%	3.39%	3.33%	3.25%	2.78%
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBON and SMHX in my portfolio?

CBON and SMHX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBON or SMHX?

SMHX has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to CBON (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBON dropped -14.13% vs SMHX's -38.53%.

Which ETF is better, CBON or SMHX?

On 1-year performance, SMHX leads with 131.85% vs 8.97% for CBON. On fees, SMHX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CBON has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBON or SMHX?

Over the 1-year period, SMHX has performed better with a 131.85% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBON or SMHX?

SMHX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBON or SMHX?

CBON has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.01% for SMHX.

What is the main difference between CBON and SMHX?

CBON is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SMHX is Semiconductors. CBON tracks ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBON and 0.35% for SMHX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.