CBON vs. GRNB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB).
CBON and GRNB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CBON is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2014. GRNB is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S&P Green Bond Select Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2017. Both CBON and GRNB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CBON or GRNB.
Correlation
The correlation between CBON and GRNB is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CBON vs. GRNB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CBON:
0.43
GRNB:
1.70
CBON:
0.67
GRNB:
2.58
CBON:
1.08
GRNB:
1.31
CBON:
0.29
GRNB:
0.74
CBON:
0.96
GRNB:
6.05
CBON:
2.28%
GRNB:
1.15%
CBON:
5.09%
GRNB:
4.11%
CBON:
-14.13%
GRNB:
-18.08%
CBON:
-5.04%
GRNB:
-2.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBON achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than GRNB's 2.27% return.
CBON
0.31%
0.26%
-0.93%
2.21%
2.52%
1.87%
GRNB
2.27%
0.52%
1.79%
7.44%
0.48%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CBON vs. GRNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBON has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNB's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CBON vs. GRNB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CBON
GRNB
CBON vs. GRNB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CBON vs. GRNB - Dividend Comparison
CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than GRNB's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 1.76% | 2.15% | 3.01% | 2.70% | 3.05% | 2.87% | 3.87% | 3.39% | 3.33% | 3.25% | 2.78% | 0.28% |
GRNB VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF | 3.91% | 3.83% | 3.17% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.24% | 1.79% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CBON vs. GRNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBON drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum GRNB drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBON and GRNB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CBON vs. GRNB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB) have volatilities of 1.99% and 1.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.