CBON vs. LAND
CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CBON returned 3.01%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for LAND. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CBON vs. LAND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBON achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly higher than LAND's -3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CBON has outperformed LAND with an annualized return of 3.01%, while LAND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.32% annualized return.
CBON
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.44%
LAND
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- -7.01%
- 3Y*
- -16.85%
- 5Y*
- -15.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $207.99K | $136.05K | $172.83K | |
| $4.89M | $5.73M | $5.80M |
CBON vs. LAND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 5.29% | 5.46% | 1.85% | 2.92% | -7.99% | 5.93% | 12.01% | 2.67% | 1.88% | 6.96% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -3.62% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBON and LAND is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2014 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBON vs. LAND — Risk / Return Rank
CBON
LAND
CBON vs. LAND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBON | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.92 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | -0.52 | +6.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.44 | -1.07 | +25.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBON vs. LAND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBON drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum LAND drawdown of -76.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBON and LAND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBON | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.13% | -76.45% | +62.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.34% | -30.74% | +29.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -43.87% | +39.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.13% | -76.45% | +62.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.13% | -76.45% | +62.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -75.36% | +75.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -31.08% | +27.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 17.36% | -17.01% |
Volatility
CBON vs. LAND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) is 1.06%, while Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that CBON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBON | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 5.65% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 22.32% | -19.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 29.03% | -25.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 31.31% | -26.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.55% | 29.96% | -24.41% |
Dividends
CBON vs. LAND - Dividend Comparison
CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than LAND's 6.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.15% | 3.01% | 2.70% | 3.05% | 2.87% | 3.87% | 3.39% | 3.33% | 3.25% | 2.78% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.57% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBON and LAND have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAND has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to CBON (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBON dropped -14.13% vs LAND's -76.45%.
CBON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBON and LAND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer