PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBL vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBL vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBL achieves a 31.84% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 66.09% return.


CBL

1D
0.34%
1M
0.59%
YTD
31.84%
6M
31.52%
1Y
94.51%
3Y*
35.18%
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
0.56%
1M
-20.38%
YTD
66.09%
6M
68.85%
1Y
39.63%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
18.89%
10Y*
1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBL vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
31.84%37.21%28.52%12.96%-17.96%18.86%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
66.09%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%-5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CBL and USO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.02

The correlation between CBL and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBL vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBL
CBL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBL vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBLUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.19

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.68

1.57

+6.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.80

3.47

+22.33

CBL vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBL Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBL and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBL vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBL drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBL and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-98.19%

+64.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-25.32%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-26.05%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-87.78%

+83.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

-75.31%

+62.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

11.47%

-7.81%

Volatility

CBL vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) is 7.90%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 12.67%. This indicates that CBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.90%

12.67%

-4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

39.34%

-19.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.79%

44.29%

-17.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.30%

36.30%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.30%

39.04%

-6.74%

Dividends

CBL vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

CBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
4.54%6.76%5.44%6.14%12.78%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBL and USO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to CBL (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBL dropped -34.02% vs USO's -98.19%.

CBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBL and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer