CBG.L vs. IMPUF
CBG.L (Close Brothers Group plc) and IMPUF (Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd) are both stocks. CBG.L operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while IMPUF operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CBG.L returned -20.09%/yr vs -2.71%/yr for IMPUF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBG.L is traded in GBp, while IMPUF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IMPUF values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBG.L achieves a -20.88% return, which is significantly higher than IMPUF's -26.77% return.
CBG.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- 6M
- -21.26%
- YTD
- -20.88%
- 1Y
- 0.73%
- 3Y*
- -22.69%
- 5Y*
- -20.09%
- 10Y*
- -6.53%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.01%
IMPUF
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- 6M
- -38.50%
- YTD
- -26.77%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- -2.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 32.01%
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBG.L Close Brothers Group plc | -20.88% | 121.21% | -70.25% | -17.80% | -20.21% | 5.65% | -8.01% | 12.32% |
IMPUF Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd | -26.77% | 179.04% | 14.11% | -62.02% | 5.83% | 13.09% | 45.16% | 407.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBG.L and IMPUF is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019 | -0.05 |
Fundamentals
CBG.L:
£623.05M
IMPUF:
$9.98B
CBG.L:
-£0.82
IMPUF:
-ZAR 9.64
CBG.L:
0.34
IMPUF:
0.88
CBG.L:
0.42
IMPUF:
1.72
CBG.L:
£1.84B
IMPUF:
ZAR 188.26B
CBG.L:
£1.58B
IMPUF:
ZAR 17.78B
CBG.L:
£174.70M
IMPUF:
ZAR 29.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBG.L vs. IMPUF — Risk / Return Rank
CBG.L
IMPUF
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) and Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBG.L | IMPUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.10 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 0.05 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 0.09 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBG.L drawdown since its inception was -86.76%, which is greater than IMPUF's maximum drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBG.L and IMPUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBG.L | IMPUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.76% | -79.17% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.33% | -49.73% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.32% | -55.55% | -23.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.23% | -78.99% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.41% | -48.96% | -21.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.54% | -38.83% | +15.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.73% | 25.76% | -8.03% |
Volatility
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Volatility Comparison
Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) has a higher volatility of 15.58% compared to Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) at 11.26%. This indicates that CBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMPUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBG.L | IMPUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.58% | 11.26% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.22% | 53.61% | -17.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.23% | 73.78% | -22.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 63.59% | -14.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.92% | 105.43% | -65.51% |
Dividends
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Dividend Comparison
CBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMPUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBG.L Close Brothers Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 6.30% | 4.27% | 4.54% | 4.13% | 4.38% | 4.14% | 3.94% | 4.00% |
IMPUF Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.80% | 7.85% | 10.80% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Close Brothers Group plc and Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBG.L vs. IMPUF - Profitability Comparison
CBG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a gross profit of 78.50M and revenue of 358.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
IMPUF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 60.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
CBG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported an operating income of -65.50M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.3%.
IMPUF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 13.33B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
CBG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a net income of -64.40M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.
IMPUF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 9.25B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBG.L and IMPUF have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CBG.L and IMPUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer