PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMPUF vs. B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMPUF vs. B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) and Barrick Mining Corporation (B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMPUF achieves a -11.27% return, which is significantly lower than B's -2.66% return.


IMPUF

1D
-1.10%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-11.27%
6M
20.64%
1Y
91.01%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*

B

1D
-3.10%
1M
9.64%
YTD
-2.66%
6M
4.67%
1Y
113.12%
3Y*
37.34%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMPUF vs. B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IMPUF
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd
-11.27%200.45%12.15%-60.02%-5.41%12.03%50.30%410.99%
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
-2.66%186.91%-12.29%7.86%-6.81%-14.75%24.60%48.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IMPUF and B is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019

0.16

The correlation between IMPUF and B shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMPUF:

$12.15B

B:

$70.12B

EPS

IMPUF:

-$9.66

B:

$3.59

PS Ratio

IMPUF:

0.06

B:

3.74

PB Ratio

IMPUF:

0.13

B:

2.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMPUF:

$188.26B

B:

$19.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMPUF:

$17.78B

B:

$10.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMPUF:

$29.69B

B:

$12.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMPUF vs. B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMPUF
IMPUF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IMPUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMPUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMPUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IMPUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMPUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

B
B Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
B Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
B Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
B Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMPUF vs. B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) and Barrick Mining Corporation (B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMPUFBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.88

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

9.89

-5.44

IMPUF vs. B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMPUF Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the B Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMPUF and B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMPUFBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.59

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.42

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.19

+0.24

Drawdowns

IMPUF vs. B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMPUF drawdown since its inception was -80.80%, smaller than the maximum B drawdown of -88.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPUF and B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMPUFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.80%

-88.51%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.87%

-29.31%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.31%

-29.31%

-30.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.84%

-47.96%

-31.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.20%

-19.99%

-19.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.79%

-37.29%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.51%

11.48%

+9.03%

Volatility

IMPUF vs. B - Volatility Comparison

Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) has a higher volatility of 17.55% compared to Barrick Mining Corporation (B) at 16.36%. This indicates that IMPUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMPUFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.55%

16.36%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.16%

33.69%

+27.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.74%

44.01%

+33.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.06%

35.96%

+28.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.33%

36.71%

+70.62%

Dividends

IMPUF vs. B - Dividend Comparison

IMPUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than B's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
2.20%1.21%2.58%2.21%3.20%2.47%1.82%0.70%1.40%0.83%0.50%1.90%
IMPUF
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd
1.78%0.00%0.00%6.80%7.85%10.80%1.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IMPUF vs. B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd and Barrick Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B202120222023202420252026
60.36B
5.18B
(IMPUF) Total Revenue
(B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IMPUF vs. B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd and Barrick Mining Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
22.1%
57.5%
Portfolio components
IMPUF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 60.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.97B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

IMPUF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 13.33B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.

B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 2.94B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.

IMPUF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 9.25B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMPUF and B have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMPUF has higher volatility (17.55%) compared to B (16.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMPUF dropped -80.80% vs B's -88.51%.

B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMPUF and B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer