PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBG.L vs. PROK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBG.L vs. PROK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) and ProKidney Corp. (PROK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBG.L is traded in GBp, while PROK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PROK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBG.L achieves a -14.14% return, which is significantly higher than PROK's -22.48% return.


CBG.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
1.59%
YTD
-14.14%
6M
1.45%
1Y
37.61%
3Y*
-21.16%
5Y*
-19.78%
10Y*
-6.62%

PROK

1D
-8.71%
1M
-7.23%
YTD
-22.48%
6M
-30.05%
1Y
123.57%
3Y*
-48.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBG.L vs. PROK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBG.L
Close Brothers Group plc
-14.14%121.21%-70.25%-17.80%6.45%
PROK
ProKidney Corp.
-22.48%23.10%-3.40%-75.35%-21.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CBG.L and PROK is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBG.L:

£671.11M

PROK:

$245.53B

EPS

CBG.L:

-£0.82

PROK:

-$0.00

PS Ratio

CBG.L:

0.36

PROK:

69.24K

PB Ratio

CBG.L:

0.46

PROK:

933.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBG.L:

£1.84B

PROK:

$889.00K

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBG.L:

£1.58B

PROK:

-$2.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBG.L:

£174.70M

PROK:

-$112.46M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBG.L vs. PROK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBG.L
CBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PROK
PROK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PROK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PROK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PROK Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PROK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PROK Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBG.L vs. PROK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) and ProKidney Corp. (PROK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBG.LPROKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.24

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

6.84

-5.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.78

-0.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.78

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.36

2.37

-0.01

CBG.L vs. PROK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the PROK Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBG.L and PROK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBG.LPROKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.24

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.13

+0.34

Drawdowns

CBG.L vs. PROK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBG.L drawdown since its inception was -86.76%, smaller than the maximum PROK drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBG.L and PROK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBG.LPROKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.76%

-96.46%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.33%

-69.67%

+32.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.97%

-96.09%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.89%

-88.60%

+20.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-65.86%

+43.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.88%

52.38%

-36.50%

Volatility

CBG.L vs. PROK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) is 12.27%, while ProKidney Corp. (PROK) has a volatility of 18.26%. This indicates that CBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PROK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBG.LPROKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.27%

18.26%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.37%

50.31%

-15.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.74%

526.26%

-474.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.98%

284.91%

-235.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.23%

284.91%

-244.68%

Dividends

CBG.L vs. PROK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBG.L nor PROK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBG.L
Close Brothers Group plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%8.50%6.30%4.27%2.89%4.13%4.38%4.14%3.94%4.00%
PROK
ProKidney Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CBG.L vs. PROK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Close Brothers Group plc and ProKidney Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
358.00M
226.00K
(CBG.L) Total Revenue
(PROK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CBG.L values in GBp, PROK values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CBG.L and PROK have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBG.L and PROK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer