PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMPUF vs. FRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMPUF is traded in USD, while FRES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FRES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMPUF achieves a -11.27% return, which is significantly lower than FRES.L's -3.09% return.


IMPUF

1D
-1.10%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-11.27%
6M
20.64%
1Y
91.01%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*

FRES.L

1D
-3.97%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
19.71%
1Y
162.44%
3Y*
75.86%
5Y*
31.83%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IMPUF
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd
-11.27%200.45%12.15%-60.02%-5.41%12.03%50.30%410.99%
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
-3.09%511.09%4.36%-29.44%-7.20%-19.52%84.40%-32.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IMPUF and FRES.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019

0.14

The correlation between IMPUF and FRES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMPUF:

$12.15B

FRES.L:

£23.34B

EPS

IMPUF:

-$9.66

FRES.L:

£2.08

PS Ratio

IMPUF:

0.06

FRES.L:

2.91

PB Ratio

IMPUF:

0.13

FRES.L:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMPUF:

$188.26B

FRES.L:

£8.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMPUF:

$17.78B

FRES.L:

£3.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMPUF:

$29.69B

FRES.L:

£3.90B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMPUF vs. FRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMPUF
IMPUF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IMPUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMPUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMPUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IMPUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMPUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FRES.L
FRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMPUFFRES.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

2.86

-1.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

3.13

-1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

4.93

-2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

11.57

-7.12

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMPUF Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMPUF and FRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMPUFFRES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.86

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.70

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.22

+0.21

Drawdowns

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMPUF drawdown since its inception was -80.80%, smaller than the maximum FRES.L drawdown of -86.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPUF and FRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMPUFFRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.80%

-86.78%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.87%

-32.72%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.31%

-34.38%

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.84%

-55.86%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.20%

-28.54%

-10.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.79%

-45.56%

+3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.51%

13.98%

+6.53%

Volatility

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) is 17.55%, while Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) has a volatility of 20.68%. This indicates that IMPUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMPUFFRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.55%

20.68%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.16%

43.88%

+17.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.74%

56.52%

+21.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.06%

45.17%

+18.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.33%

45.34%

+61.99%

Dividends

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison

IMPUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than FRES.L's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
3.00%2.00%1.35%1.98%2.44%2.66%1.00%2.35%3.49%1.74%0.74%0.47%
IMPUF
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd
1.78%0.00%0.00%6.80%7.85%10.80%1.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd and Fresnillo plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
60.36B
2.59B
(IMPUF) Total Revenue
(FRES.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IMPUF values in USD, FRES.L values in GBp

IMPUF vs. FRES.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd and Fresnillo plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
22.1%
57.7%
Portfolio components
IMPUF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 60.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

FRES.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 2.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

IMPUF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 13.33B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.

FRES.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fresnillo plc reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 53.5%.

IMPUF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 9.25B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

FRES.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a net income of 994.96M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMPUF and FRES.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMPUF and FRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer