CBG.L vs. BAB.L
CBG.L (Close Brothers Group plc) and BAB.L (Babcock International Group plc) are both stocks. CBG.L operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while BAB.L operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CBG.L returned -6.62%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for BAB.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBG.L achieves a -14.14% return, which is significantly higher than BAB.L's -17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CBG.L has underperformed BAB.L with an annualized return of -6.62%, while BAB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.89% annualized return.
CBG.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -14.14%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 37.61%
- 3Y*
- -21.16%
- 5Y*
- -19.78%
- 10Y*
- -6.62%
BAB.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- -17.02%
- 6M
- -8.68%
- 1Y
- 1.62%
- 3Y*
- 49.93%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBG.L Close Brothers Group plc | -14.14% | 121.21% | -70.25% | -17.80% | -20.21% | 5.65% | -10.18% | 16.61% | 3.71% | 4.36% |
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | -17.02% | 150.05% | 27.98% | 40.56% | -11.42% | 13.83% | -55.53% | 36.99% | -27.77% | -23.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBG.L and BAB.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1993 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CBG.L and BAB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CBG.L:
£671.11M
BAB.L:
£5.29B
CBG.L:
-£0.82
BAB.L:
£0.94
CBG.L:
0.36
BAB.L:
0.55
CBG.L:
0.46
BAB.L:
7.30
CBG.L:
£1.84B
BAB.L:
£9.58B
CBG.L:
£1.58B
BAB.L:
£699.70M
CBG.L:
£174.70M
BAB.L:
£961.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBG.L vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBG.L
BAB.L
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBG.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.04 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.04 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 0.12 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBG.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.05 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.84 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | 0.05 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.24 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBG.L drawdown since its inception was -86.76%, which is greater than BAB.L's maximum drawdown of -81.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBG.L and BAB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBG.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.76% | -81.10% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.33% | -36.28% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.97% | -36.28% | -43.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.55% | -36.28% | -50.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.76% | -79.18% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.89% | -31.32% | -36.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -35.12% | +12.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.88% | 13.68% | +2.20% |
Volatility
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison
Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) have volatilities of 12.27% and 12.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBG.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.27% | 12.11% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | 25.97% | +8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.74% | 35.57% | +16.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.98% | 33.61% | +15.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.23% | 36.39% | +3.84% |
Dividends
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison
CBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 0.68% | 0.56% | 1.06% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 6.08% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 2.38% |
CBG.L Close Brothers Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 6.30% | 4.27% | 2.89% | 4.13% | 4.38% | 4.14% | 3.94% | 4.00% |
Financials
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Close Brothers Group plc and Babcock International Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBG.L vs. BAB.L - Profitability Comparison
CBG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a gross profit of 78.50M and revenue of 358.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
BAB.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a gross profit of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
CBG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported an operating income of -65.50M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.3%.
BAB.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
CBG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a net income of -64.40M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.
BAB.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a net income of 169.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBG.L and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CBG.L and BAB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer