CBAT vs. ELF
CBAT (CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.) and ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.) are both stocks. CBAT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while ELF operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, CBAT returned -33.03%/yr vs 17.79%/yr for ELF. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBAT vs. ELF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBAT achieves a -22.40% return, which is significantly lower than ELF's -16.50% return.
CBAT
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -13.60%
- YTD
- -22.40%
- 6M
- -27.36%
- 1Y
- -43.16%
- 3Y*
- -20.91%
- 5Y*
- -33.03%
- 10Y*
- -12.80%
ELF
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 20.02%
- YTD
- -16.50%
- 6M
- -19.08%
- 1Y
- -48.43%
- 3Y*
- -16.34%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CBAT vs. ELF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBAT CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. | -22.40% | -11.16% | -10.48% | 6.06% | -36.54% | -69.17% | 340.00% | 202.71% | -74.33% | 5.18% |
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | -16.50% | -39.43% | -13.02% | 161.01% | 66.52% | 31.84% | 56.17% | 86.26% | -61.18% | -22.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBAT and ELF is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.14 |
The correlation between CBAT and ELF shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CBAT:
$57.83M
ELF:
$3.81B
CBAT:
-$0.10
ELF:
$0.44
CBAT:
0.30
ELF:
2.30
CBAT:
0.00
ELF:
3.37
CBAT:
$195.19M
ELF:
$1.64B
CBAT:
$18.42M
ELF:
$1.16B
CBAT:
-$18.44M
ELF:
$185.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBAT vs. ELF — Risk / Return Rank
CBAT
ELF
CBAT vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBAT | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.89 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.73 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | -1.19 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBAT vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBAT drawdown since its inception was -99.49%, which is greater than ELF's maximum drawdown of -77.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBAT and ELF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBAT | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.49% | -77.26% | -22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.44% | -66.20% | +18.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.13% | -77.26% | +11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.94% | -77.26% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.96% | -70.88% | -28.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.49% | -32.52% | -46.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.43% | 40.83% | -13.40% |
Volatility
CBAT vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) has a higher volatility of 21.05% compared to e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) at 17.28%. This indicates that CBAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBAT | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.05% | 17.28% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.78% | 43.47% | -9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.38% | 67.04% | -14.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.54% | 57.51% | +12.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.72% | 55.29% | +43.43% |
Dividends
CBAT vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBAT nor ELF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CBAT vs. ELF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CBAT and ELF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBAT has higher volatility (21.05%) compared to ELF (17.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBAT dropped -99.49% vs ELF's -77.26%.
ELF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBAT and ELF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer