PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBAT vs. SHIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBAT vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBAT achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 73.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CBAT has outperformed SHIP with an annualized return of -11.25%, while SHIP has yielded a comparatively lower -42.51% annualized return.


CBAT

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
-5.21%
6M
-10.10%
1Y
-21.62%
3Y*
-12.95%
5Y*
-29.17%
10Y*
-11.25%

SHIP

1D
-3.97%
1M
1.75%
YTD
73.33%
6M
53.76%
1Y
156.09%
3Y*
61.53%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
-42.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBAT vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
-5.21%-11.16%-10.48%6.06%-36.54%-69.17%340.00%202.71%-74.33%5.18%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
73.33%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-51.66%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CBAT and SHIP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2007

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBAT:

$70.65M

SHIP:

$328.51M

EPS

CBAT:

-$0.10

SHIP:

$1.00

PS Ratio

CBAT:

0.36

SHIP:

2.06

PB Ratio

CBAT:

0.00

SHIP:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBAT:

$195.19M

SHIP:

$158.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBAT:

$18.42M

SHIP:

$62.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBAT:

-$18.44M

SHIP:

$78.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBAT vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBAT
CBAT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBAT vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBATSHIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

3.70

-4.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.32

4.17

-4.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.51

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

8.83

-9.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

21.98

-22.73

CBAT vs. SHIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the SHIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBAT and SHIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBATSHIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

3.70

-4.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.32

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

-0.43

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.10

+0.09

Drawdowns

CBAT vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBAT drawdown since its inception was -99.49%, roughly equal to the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBAT and SHIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBATSHIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.49%

-100.00%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.02%

-18.56%

-22.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.13%

-57.61%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.20%

-69.11%

-18.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.34%

-99.98%

+5.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.73%

-99.98%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.45%

-86.56%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.11%

7.46%

+18.65%

Volatility

CBAT vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison

CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) has a higher volatility of 19.73% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) at 18.54%. This indicates that CBAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBATSHIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.73%

18.54%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.31%

33.97%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.09%

42.55%

+11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.63%

52.12%

+17.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.80%

98.60%

+0.20%

Dividends

CBAT vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison

CBAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.73%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%

Financials

CBAT vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
58.80M
49.42M
(CBAT) Total Revenue
(SHIP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CBAT and SHIP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBAT has higher volatility (19.73%) compared to SHIP (18.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBAT dropped -99.49% vs SHIP's -100.00%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBAT and SHIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer