CBALX vs. AYBLX
CBALX (Columbia Balanced Fund) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, CBALX returned 10.22%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for AYBLX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBALX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.
Performance
CBALX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBALX achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 13.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CBALX having a 10.22% annualized return and AYBLX not far ahead at 10.67%.
CBALX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 16.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
AYBLX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
CBALX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund | 5.48% | 14.14% | 14.60% | 21.49% | -16.63% | 14.92% | 17.91% | 23.05% | -5.75% | 14.29% |
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 13.99% | 19.80% | 9.64% | 15.41% | -14.39% | 15.48% | 12.92% | 22.22% | -4.43% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBALX and AYBLX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1997 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CBALX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBALX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank
CBALX
AYBLX
CBALX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBALX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.62 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 5.16 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 24.00 | -13.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBALX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBALX drawdown since its inception was -34.53%, roughly equal to the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBALX and AYBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBALX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.53% | -36.28% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -6.41% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.06% | -13.39% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.91% | -20.26% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.73% | -24.24% | +1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -0.52% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -3.78% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.38% | +0.21% |
Volatility
CBALX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) have volatilities of 3.69% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBALX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 3.63% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.10% | 7.83% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 9.95% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 11.13% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 11.33% | +0.06% |
CBALX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBALX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBALX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison
CBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 3.24% | 3.58% | 2.59% | 1.76% | 3.23% | 8.61% | 4.12% | 6.03% | 9.97% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 4.14% |
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund | 6.22% | 6.42% | 7.83% | 1.84% | 5.36% | 9.26% | 5.31% | 4.16% | 5.82% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBALX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBALX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to AYBLX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBALX dropped -34.53% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.
AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBALX and AYBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer