PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CB vs. TXRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CB vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chubb Limited (CB) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than TXRH's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has underperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 12.26%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively higher 15.87% annualized return.


CB

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.18%
YTD
5.39%
6M
5.22%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
12.26%

TXRH

1D
-0.19%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
1.81%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
-6.55%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
15.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CB vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CB
Chubb Limited
5.39%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.81%-6.57%49.78%37.15%4.16%15.71%39.83%-3.62%15.11%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CB and TXRH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between CB and TXRH has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CB:

$129.01B

TXRH:

$11.08B

EPS

CB:

$28.35

TXRH:

$6.26

PE Ratio

CB:

11.53

TXRH:

26.77

PEG Ratio

CB:

0.80

TXRH:

1.67

PS Ratio

CB:

2.71

TXRH:

1.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

CB:

$48.15B

TXRH:

$6.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CB:

$17.01B

TXRH:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

CB:

$12.22B

TXRH:

$701.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CB vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TXRH
TXRH Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TXRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXRH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TXRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXRH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CB vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBTXRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.98

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

-0.34

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

-0.58

+4.35

CB vs. TXRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CB Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the TXRH Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CB and TXRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CB vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and TXRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTXRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-76.59%

+25.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-19.61%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-24.82%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.26%

-30.45%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.59%

-58.04%

+15.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-16.13%

+12.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-16.15%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

11.36%

-7.25%

Volatility

CB vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 5.99%, while Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTXRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

9.69%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

22.58%

-9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

29.24%

-11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.33%

30.58%

-10.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.69%

35.63%

-11.94%

Dividends

CB vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison

CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than TXRH's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.20%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.71%1.64%1.35%1.80%2.02%1.34%0.46%2.13%1.68%1.59%1.58%1.90%

Financials

CB vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.88B
1.63B
(CB) Total Revenue
(TXRH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CB and TXRH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TXRH has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to CB (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs TXRH's -76.59%.

CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CB and TXRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer