TXRH vs. CAVA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA).

Performance

TXRH vs. CAVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TXRH vs. CAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc.	-1.94%	-6.57%	49.78%	11.58%
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	36.55%	-47.97%	162.45%	-1.83%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TXRH : $10.74B CAVA : $9.46B
EPS TXRH : $6.10 CAVA : $0.54
PE Ratio TXRH : 26.55 CAVA : 148.69
PEG Ratio TXRH : 1.65 CAVA : 0.86
PS Ratio TXRH : 1.83 CAVA : 11.18
Total Revenue (TTM) TXRH : $5.88B CAVA : $847.84M
Gross Profit (TTM) TXRH : $1.79B CAVA : $571.37M
EBITDA (TTM) TXRH : $681.49M CAVA : $148.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXRH achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than CAVA's 36.55% return.

TXRH

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -9.67%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: -2.53%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

CAVA

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 36.55%
• 6M: 29.95%
• 1Y: -8.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TXRH vs. CAVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXRH

TXRH Risk / Return Rank: 35
TXRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TXRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
TXRH Omega Ratio Rank: 30
TXRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TXRH Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CAVA

CAVA Risk / Return Rank: 36
CAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXRH vs. CAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TXRH	CAVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	-0.13	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	0.25	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.03	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	-0.13	+0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	-0.24	+0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TXRH vs. CAVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXRH Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is higher than the CAVA Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXRH and CAVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TXRH	CAVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	-0.13	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.41	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between TXRH and CAVA is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TXRH vs. CAVA - Dividend Comparison

TXRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while CAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc.	1.72%	1.64%	1.35%	1.80%	2.02%	1.34%	0.46%	2.13%	1.68%	1.59%	1.58%	1.90%
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TXRH vs. CAVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXRH drawdown since its inception was -76.59%, which is greater than CAVA's maximum drawdown of -71.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXRH and CAVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TXRH	CAVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.59%	-71.11%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-56.28%	+36.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.22%	-46.88%	+27.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.15%	-29.14%	+12.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.12%	30.49%	-19.37%

Volatility

TXRH vs. CAVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is 6.81%, while CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) has a volatility of 14.75%. This indicates that TXRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TXRH	CAVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.81%	14.75%	-7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.85%	43.96%	-25.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.21%	60.92%	-32.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.01%	59.91%	-29.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.27%	59.91%	-24.64%

Financials