CB vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CB (Chubb Limited) is a stock, while MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Over the past year, CB returned 6.88% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

CB vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chubb Limited (CB) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.

CB

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -3.80%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: 11.41%

MUU

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 218.90%
• YTD: 961.23%
• 6M: 1,422.01%
• 1Y: 6,522.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CB vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CB Chubb Limited	0.50%	14.46%	-2.63%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	961.23%	599.03%	-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CB and MUU is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	-0.18

The correlation between CB and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CB vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CB

CB Risk / Return Rank: 51
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CB vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CB	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	50.40	-50.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	7.17	-6.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.91	-0.83
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	125.85	-125.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.55	426.84	-425.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CB vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CB Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 50.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CB and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CB	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	50.40	-50.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	6.68	-6.29

Drawdowns

CB vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CB	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-75.07%	+24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-52.72%	+43.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.49%	0.00%	-8.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.68%	-23.44%	+12.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.87%	15.51%	-10.64%

Volatility

CB vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 4.57%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CB	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	54.78%	-50.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.54%	105.07%	-92.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.33%	131.77%	-114.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.28%	133.67%	-113.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.65%	133.67%	-110.02%

Dividends

CB vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CB Chubb Limited	1.24%	1.22%	1.30%	1.51%	1.49%	1.65%	2.01%	1.91%	2.24%	1.93%	2.07%	4.23%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.46%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CB and MUU in my portfolio?

CB and MUU have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CB or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to CB (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.