CB vs. ETN
CB (Chubb Limited) and ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) are both stocks. CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while ETN operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CB returned 11.89%/yr vs 23.50%/yr for ETN. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CB vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 27.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 11.89%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.50% annualized return.
CB
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
ETN
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 27.32%
- 6M
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 30.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.42%
- 10Y*
- 23.50%
CB vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 3.43% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 27.32% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and ETN is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1993 | 0.36 |
The correlation between CB and ETN shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CB:
$127.01B
ETN:
$156.90B
CB:
$28.35
ETN:
$10.22
CB:
11.35
ETN:
39.43
CB:
0.79
ETN:
2.14
CB:
2.67
ETN:
5.52
CB:
1.59
ETN:
7.94
CB:
$48.15B
ETN:
$28.52B
CB:
$17.01B
ETN:
$7.87B
CB:
$12.22B
ETN:
$4.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
CB
ETN
CB vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CB | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 2.63 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CB | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.71 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.82 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.79 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
CB vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -68.95% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -19.14% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -34.46% | +20.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -34.46% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | -44.55% | +1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -6.64% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -14.90% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 8.78% | -4.26% |
Volatility
CB vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 6.11%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 12.39%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 12.39% | -6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 25.71% | -12.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 32.58% | -14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 30.03% | -9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 30.01% | -6.32% |
Dividends
CB vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than ETN's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
Financials
CB vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and ETN have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs ETN's -68.95%.
ETN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer