CB vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Chubb Limited (CB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CB or XLF.
Performance
CB vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 28.71% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 34.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CB having a 12.10% annualized return and XLF not far behind at 11.94%.
CB
28.71%
-4.53%
5.70%
31.15%
15.65%
12.10%
XLF
34.14%
5.03%
18.26%
45.53%
13.12%
11.94%
Key characteristics
CB | XLF | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.96 | 3.35 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.69 | 4.71 |
Omega Ratio | 1.37 | 1.61 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.95 | 3.56 |
Martin Ratio | 10.63 | 23.90 |
Ulcer Index | 3.18% | 1.93% |
Daily Std Dev | 17.23% | 13.75% |
Max Drawdown | -64.24% | -82.69% |
Current Drawdown | -4.60% | -0.04% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between CB and XLF is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CB vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CB vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than XLF's 1.33% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chubb Limited | 1.23% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 2.28% | 2.79% | 1.46% |
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.33% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
CB vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -64.24%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CB vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 4.30%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.