CAVA vs. EAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT).

Performance

CAVA vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAVA vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	36.55%	-47.97%	162.45%	-1.83%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	-0.12%	8.49%	206.37%	18.40%

Fundamentals

EPS CAVA : $0.54 EAT : $14.76
PE Ratio CAVA : 148.69 EAT : 9.71
PEG Ratio CAVA : 0.86 EAT : 0.22
PS Ratio CAVA : 11.18 EAT : 0.78
Total Revenue (TTM) CAVA : $847.84M EAT : $5.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) CAVA : $571.37M EAT : $2.64B
EBITDA (TTM) CAVA : $148.08M EAT : $752.80M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAVA achieves a 36.55% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's -0.12% return.

CAVA

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 36.55%
• 6M: 29.95%
• 1Y: -8.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: -5.01%
• 3Y*: 55.67%
• 5Y*: 14.79%
• 10Y*: 13.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CAVA vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAVA

CAVA Risk / Return Rank: 36
CAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 37

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAVA vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAVA	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	-0.11	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	0.18	+0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.02	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	-0.09	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	-0.19	-0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAVA vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAVA Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is comparable to the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAVA and EAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAVA	EAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	-0.11	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.28	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between CAVA and EAT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CAVA vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAVA nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%

Drawdowns

CAVA vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAVA drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAVA and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAVA	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.11%	-88.40%	+17.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	-44.41%	-11.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.88%	-24.21%	-22.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.14%	-24.34%	-4.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.49%	19.81%	+10.68%

Volatility

CAVA vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) have volatilities of 14.75% and 14.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAVA	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.75%	14.11%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.96%	32.57%	+11.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.92%	47.16%	+13.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.91%	48.38%	+11.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.91%	54.54%	+5.37%

Financials