CAVA vs. TXRH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH).

Performance

CAVA vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAVA vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	36.55%	-47.97%	162.45%	-1.83%
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc.	-1.94%	-6.57%	49.78%	11.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CAVA : $9.46B TXRH : $10.74B
EPS CAVA : $0.54 TXRH : $6.10
PE Ratio CAVA : 148.69 TXRH : 26.55
PEG Ratio CAVA : 0.86 TXRH : 1.65
PS Ratio CAVA : 11.18 TXRH : 1.83
Total Revenue (TTM) CAVA : $847.84M TXRH : $5.88B
Gross Profit (TTM) CAVA : $571.37M TXRH : $1.79B
EBITDA (TTM) CAVA : $148.08M TXRH : $681.49M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAVA achieves a 36.55% return, which is significantly higher than TXRH's -1.94% return.

CAVA

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 36.55%
• 6M: 29.95%
• 1Y: -8.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TXRH

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -9.67%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: -2.53%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CAVA vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAVA

CAVA Risk / Return Rank: 36
CAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 37

TXRH

TXRH Risk / Return Rank: 35
TXRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TXRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
TXRH Omega Ratio Rank: 30
TXRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TXRH Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAVA vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAVA	TXRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	-0.09	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	0.07	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.01	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	-0.06	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	-0.11	-0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAVA vs. TXRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAVA Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the TXRH Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAVA and TXRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAVA	TXRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	-0.09	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.41	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between CAVA and TXRH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CAVA vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison

CAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TXRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc.	1.72%	1.64%	1.35%	1.80%	2.02%	1.34%	0.46%	2.13%	1.68%	1.59%	1.58%	1.90%

Drawdowns

CAVA vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAVA drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, smaller than the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAVA and TXRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAVA	TXRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.11%	-76.59%	+5.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	-20.21%	-36.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.88%	-19.22%	-27.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.14%	-16.15%	-12.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.49%	11.12%	+19.37%

Volatility

CAVA vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison

CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) has a higher volatility of 14.75% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) at 6.81%. This indicates that CAVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAVA	TXRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.75%	6.81%	+7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.96%	18.85%	+25.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.92%	28.21%	+32.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.91%	30.01%	+29.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.91%	35.27%	+24.64%

Financials