EAT vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EAT or QQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and QQQ is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EAT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EAT:
2.64
QQQ:
0.47
EAT:
2.88
QQQ:
0.81
EAT:
1.40
QQQ:
1.11
EAT:
4.30
QQQ:
0.51
EAT:
11.31
QQQ:
1.67
EAT:
12.15%
QQQ:
6.93%
EAT:
52.14%
QQQ:
25.14%
EAT:
-88.40%
QQQ:
-82.98%
EAT:
-27.76%
QQQ:
-9.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -4.34% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.50%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.21% annualized return.
EAT
3.29%
2.81%
23.43%
136.07%
43.72%
11.50%
QQQ
-4.34%
17.36%
-4.62%
11.64%
17.57%
17.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EAT vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EAT
QQQ
EAT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EAT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.77% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
EAT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EAT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 22.13% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 13.83%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.