EAT vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EAT or QQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and QQQ is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EAT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EAT:
4.94
QQQ:
1.30
EAT:
4.74
QQQ:
1.78
EAT:
1.63
QQQ:
1.24
EAT:
5.08
QQQ:
1.76
EAT:
34.21
QQQ:
6.08
EAT:
6.44%
QQQ:
3.92%
EAT:
44.69%
QQQ:
18.35%
EAT:
-88.40%
QQQ:
-82.98%
EAT:
-23.41%
QQQ:
-2.49%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.86%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.06% annualized return.
EAT
9.51%
-5.07%
103.67%
217.63%
29.41%
10.86%
QQQ
2.90%
-1.02%
9.93%
20.80%
18.77%
18.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EAT vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EAT
QQQ
EAT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EAT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.77% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
EAT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EAT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 21.01% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.02%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.