CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE
CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and 2B79.DE (iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery while 2B79.DE tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Digitalisation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAUT.DE returned 1.53%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for 2B79.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAUT.DE charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 2B79.DE.
Performance
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than 2B79.DE's 1.48% return.
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2B79.DE
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- -2.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -35.25% | -26.40% |
2B79.DE iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF | 1.48% | -6.47% | 29.11% | 28.57% | -21.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUT.DE and 2B79.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CAUT.DE
2B79.DE
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAUT.DE | 2B79.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.00 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | -0.08 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | -0.19 | +4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUT.DE | 2B79.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | -0.11 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | 0.43 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than 2B79.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and 2B79.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUT.DE | 2B79.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.24% | -38.40% | -30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -22.05% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.32% | -27.88% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.96% | -13.25% | -30.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.53% | -11.26% | -34.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 10.03% | -2.52% |
Volatility
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) at 5.57%. This indicates that CAUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B79.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUT.DE | 2B79.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 5.57% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 13.51% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.22% | 17.13% | +11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 20.15% | +12.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 19.80% | +13.33% |
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B79.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUT.DE vs. 2B79.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAUT.DE nor 2B79.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUT.DE and 2B79.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B79.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B79.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery, while 2B79.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Digitalisation. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CAUT.DE and 0.40% for 2B79.DE.
Find the right allocation for CAUT.DE and 2B79.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer