PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B79.DE vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

2B79.DE vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

2B79.DE vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B79.DE
iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF
-12.42%-6.47%29.11%28.57%-32.56%8.74%28.52%29.93%-1.19%12.33%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
-3.05%5.91%33.12%49.19%-28.81%36.10%35.42%41.08%3.61%15.35%
Different Trading Currencies

2B79.DE is traded in EUR, while ^NDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^NDX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B79.DE achieves a -12.42% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's -3.41% return.


2B79.DE

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-12.42%
6M
-16.75%
1Y
-11.98%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
-1.47%
10Y*

^NDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
18.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B79.DE vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B79.DE
2B79.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
2B79.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B79.DE vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B79.DE^NDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.59

0.60

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.69

1.00

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.15

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

1.06

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

3.52

-4.27

2B79.DE vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B79.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B79.DE and ^NDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B79.DE^NDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

0.60

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.58

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.67

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between 2B79.DE and ^NDX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

2B79.DE vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B79.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -46.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B79.DE and ^NDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


2B79.DE^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.40%

-82.90%

+44.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.05%

-12.12%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.40%

-35.56%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.14%

-7.94%

-17.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-24.72%

+13.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

3.52%

+5.03%

Volatility

2B79.DE vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) is 4.62%, while NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that 2B79.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


2B79.DE^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

5.50%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

13.15%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

24.92%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.05%

22.25%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

22.85%

-3.06%