PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).

2B79.DE and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2B79.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX® FactSet Digitalisation. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both 2B79.DE and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B79.DE
iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF		-12.42%-6.47%29.11%28.57%-32.56%8.74%28.52%29.93%-1.19%12.33%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		-3.91%5.72%34.75%50.93%-29.38%38.02%35.54%42.19%3.35%15.39%
Different Trading Currencies

2B79.DE is traded in EUR, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B79.DE achieves a -12.42% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's -3.91% return.

2B79.DE

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-12.42%
6M
-16.75%
1Y
-11.98%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
-1.47%
10Y*
—

EQQQ.L

1D
0.15%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
-3.91%
6M
-1.95%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
18.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with 2B79.DE:
2B79.DE vs. XFNT.DE2B79.DE vs. ^GSPC2B79.DE vs. VWRL.AS2B79.DE vs. SCHG2B79.DE vs. ^NDX2B79.DE vs. VUSA.AS2B79.DE vs. SPYI
Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B79.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

2B79.DE
iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
2B79.DE
2B79.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
2B79.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B79.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

2B79.DEEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.59

0.76

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.69

1.16

-1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.16

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

2.30

-2.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

6.95

-7.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B79.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B79.DE and EQQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

2B79.DEEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

0.76

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.67

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.94

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.80

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between 2B79.DE and EQQQ.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

2B79.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B79.DE
iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.29%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%

Drawdowns

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B79.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B79.DE and EQQQ.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

2B79.DEEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.40%

-33.75%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.05%

-10.97%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.40%

-27.76%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.14%

-8.04%

-17.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-5.64%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

3.66%

+4.89%

Volatility

2B79.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

2B79.DEEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.79%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

11.77%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

20.01%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.05%

19.85%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

19.76%

+0.03%