PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO) and Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CAUS.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
6.47%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CASV.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
3.72%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAUS.TO and CASV.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO) and Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAUS.TOCASV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.61

5.13

-2.52

Drawdowns

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, which is greater than CASV.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUS.TO and CASV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAUS.TOCASV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-3.18%

-3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-2.73%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-0.68%

-1.00%

Volatility

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAUS.TOCASV.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

15.08%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.08%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.08%

+0.46%

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAUS.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CASV.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAUS.TO vs. CASV.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAUS.TO nor CASV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CAUS.TO and CASV.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CAUS.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CASV.TO.

CAUS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CASV.TO is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for CAUS.TO and 0.39% for CASV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAUS.TO and CASV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer