CASV.TO vs. CAUV.TO

Last updated Apr 15, 2026

CASV.TO (Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF) and CAUV.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds from Avantis. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CASV.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CAUV.TO.

Performance

CASV.TO vs. CAUV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (CAUV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CASV.TO

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 9.30%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAUV.TO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 8.91%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASV.TO vs. CAUV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF	9.30%
CAUV.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF	8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CASV.TO and CAUV.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026	0.89

Return for Risk

CASV.TO vs. CAUV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (CAUV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CASV.TO	CAUV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	12.36	0.49	+11.87

Drawdowns

CASV.TO vs. CAUV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASV.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, smaller than the maximum CAUV.TO drawdown of -7.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASV.TO and CAUV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CASV.TO	CAUV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-7.68%	+5.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	0.00%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-3.49%	+3.20%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CASV.TO	CAUV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.80%	17.87%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.80%	17.87%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	17.87%	-2.07%

CASV.TO vs. CAUV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CASV.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CAUV.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CASV.TO vs. CAUV.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CASV.TO nor CAUV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments