PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO) and Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CASV.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
3.72%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CACE.TO

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.10%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CASV.TO and CACE.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO) and Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CASV.TOCACE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.13

1.09

+4.04

Drawdowns

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASV.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum CACE.TO drawdown of -10.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASV.TO and CACE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASV.TOCACE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-10.51%

+7.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-0.64%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-2.86%

+2.18%

Volatility

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASV.TOCACE.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.08%

16.39%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

16.39%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.08%

16.39%

-1.31%

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CASV.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CACE.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

CASV.TO vs. CACE.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CASV.TO nor CACE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CASV.TO and CACE.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CACE.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CACE.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CASV.TO.

CASV.TO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while CACE.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CASV.TO and 0.19% for CACE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CASV.TO and CACE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer