CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO
CAUS.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CAUS.TO is actively managed, while VUN.TO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAUS.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for VUN.TO.
Performance
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAUS.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUN.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 10.00% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUS.TO and VUN.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CAUS.TO
VUN.TO
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUS.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.61 | 1.01 | +1.60 |
Drawdowns
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum VUN.TO drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUS.TO and VUN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUS.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -28.19% | +21.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.39% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -3.80% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUS.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 11.97% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 15.43% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 16.70% | -1.16% |
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUS.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VUN.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CAUS.TO vs. VUN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CAUS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 1.10% | 1.21% | 0.97% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUS.TO and VUN.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUN.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUN.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for CAUS.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for CAUS.TO and 0.17% for VUN.TO.
Find the right allocation for CAUS.TO and VUN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer