CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO
CAUS.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and CACE.TO (Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAUS.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while CACE.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAUS.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CACE.TO
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 10.00% |
CACE.TO Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF | 4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUS.TO and CACE.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO) and Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUS.TO | CACE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.61 | 1.09 | +1.52 |
Drawdowns
CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum CACE.TO drawdown of -10.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUS.TO and CACE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUS.TO | CACE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -10.51% | +4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.64% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -2.86% | +1.18% |
Volatility
CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUS.TO | CACE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 16.39% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 16.39% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 16.39% | -0.85% |
CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CAUS.TO and CACE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CAUS.TO vs. CACE.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAUS.TO nor CACE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUS.TO and CACE.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAUS.TO and CACE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
CAUS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CACE.TO is Canada Equities.
Find the right allocation for CAUS.TO and CACE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer