CATH vs. UPRO
CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both exchange-traded funds - CATH is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while UPRO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CATH returned 14.46%/yr vs 28.60%/yr for UPRO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CATH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
CATH vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 24.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CATH has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 14.46%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 28.60% annualized return.
CATH
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
UPRO
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 19.67%
- YTD
- 24.61%
- 1Y
- 54.64%
- 3Y*
- 43.89%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 28.60%
CATH vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 9.15% | 17.08% | 23.34% | 26.15% | -19.96% | 28.87% | 18.80% | 30.64% | -5.80% | 22.83% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 24.61% | 31.88% | 63.57% | 68.53% | -56.84% | 98.64% | 10.09% | 102.30% | -25.11% | 71.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATH and UPRO is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CATH and UPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
CATH vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CATH
UPRO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CATH
UPRO
Financial Services
CATH
UPRO
Communication Services
CATH
UPRO
Consumer Cyclical
CATH
UPRO
Industrials
CATH
UPRO
Healthcare
CATH
UPRO
Consumer Defensive
CATH
UPRO
Energy
CATH
UPRO
Utilities
CATH
UPRO
Real Estate
CATH
UPRO
Basic Materials
CATH
UPRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATH vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
CATH
UPRO
CATH vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CATH | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.05 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 8.08 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CATH vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATH | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -76.82% | +42.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -26.78% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -48.87% | +29.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | -63.94% | +35.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -76.82% | +42.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -4.60% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -14.36% | +9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 6.78% | -4.55% |
Volatility
CATH vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is 3.24%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that CATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATH | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 10.61% | -7.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 30.01% | -20.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 37.59% | -24.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 50.67% | -32.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 53.71% | -35.12% |
CATH vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATH vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than UPRO's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.77% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, CATH and UPRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UPRO has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to CATH (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs UPRO's -76.82%.
On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 28.60% vs 14.46% for CATH. On fees, CATH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 28.60% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CATH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.
CATH has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.75% for UPRO.
CATH is categorized as S&P 500, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CATH and 0.89% for UPRO.
CATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CATH and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer