CASY vs. LRCX
CASY (Casey's General Stores, Inc.) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. CASY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CASY returned 23.37%/yr vs 48.23%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CASY vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASY achieves a 62.22% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 114.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CASY has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 23.37%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 48.23% annualized return.
CASY
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 62.22%
- 6M
- 66.01%
- 1Y
- 77.24%
- 3Y*
- 60.28%
- 5Y*
- 34.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.37%
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 303.12%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
CASY vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc. | 62.22% | 40.12% | 45.01% | 23.27% | 14.49% | 11.25% | 13.24% | 25.12% | 15.59% | -4.99% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASY and LRCX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CASY and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CASY:
$33.29B
LRCX:
$463.20B
CASY:
$19.17
LRCX:
$5.29
CASY:
46.69
LRCX:
69.37
CASY:
2.23
LRCX:
5.25
CASY:
1.90
LRCX:
21.46
CASY:
8.42
LRCX:
43.76
CASY:
$17.56B
LRCX:
$21.68B
CASY:
$4.32B
LRCX:
$10.84B
CASY:
$1.58B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASY vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
CASY
LRCX
CASY vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.63 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 15.26 | -10.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | 51.20 | -32.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASY vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASY drawdown since its inception was -74.32%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASY and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.32% | -87.90% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -20.01% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.07% | -47.10% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.13% | -56.39% | +39.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.41% | -56.39% | +22.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | 0.00% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.15% | -28.17% | +13.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 5.95% | -1.90% |
Volatility
CASY vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) have volatilities of 20.67% and 21.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.67% | 21.52% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.59% | 43.63% | -18.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.95% | 52.78% | -21.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 46.57% | -18.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.13% | 44.92% | -16.79% |
Dividends
CASY vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
CASY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than LRCX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc. | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.86% | 0.89% | 0.77% | 0.70% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
CASY vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Casey's General Stores, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CASY vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
CASY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 4.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.0%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
CASY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.13B and revenue of 4.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 68.5%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
CASY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 162.68M and revenue of 4.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CASY and LRCX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to CASY (20.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CASY dropped -74.32% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CASY and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer