CASY vs. ADM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).

Performance

CASY vs. ADM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CASY vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc.	31.81%	40.12%	45.01%	23.27%	14.49%	11.25%	13.24%	25.12%	15.59%	-4.99%
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company	27.39%	18.24%	-27.52%	-20.42%	39.98%	37.33%	12.44%	17.10%	5.28%	-9.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CASY : $27.11B ADM : $35.18B
EPS CASY : $17.42 ADM : $2.23
PE Ratio CASY : 41.78 ADM : 32.64
PS Ratio CASY : 1.60 ADM : 0.44
Total Revenue (TTM) CASY : $16.98B ADM : $80.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) CASY : $3.05B ADM : $5.03B
EBITDA (TTM) CASY : $1.37B ADM : $2.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CASY achieves a 31.81% return, which is significantly higher than ADM's 27.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CASY has outperformed ADM with an annualized return of 21.22%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.

CASY

• 1D: 3.27%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 31.81%
• 6M: 29.01%
• 1Y: 68.40%
• 3Y*: 50.61%
• 5Y*: 28.18%
• 10Y*: 21.22%

ADM

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 27.39%
• 6M: 23.63%
• 1Y: 56.75%
• 3Y*: 0.24%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 10.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CASY vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CASY

CASY Risk / Return Rank: 96
CASY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CASY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CASY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CASY Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CASY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

ADM

ADM Risk / Return Rank: 90
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CASY vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CASY	ADM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.01	+0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	2.68	+0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.35	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.31	4.30	+3.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.42	12.30	+9.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CASY vs. ADM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CASY Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the ADM Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CASY and ADM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CASY	ADM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.01	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	0.28	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.39	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.25	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between CASY and ADM is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CASY vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison

CASY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than ADM's 2.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc.	0.30%	0.39%	0.47%	0.59%	0.65%	0.69%	0.72%	0.77%	0.86%	0.89%	0.77%	0.70%
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company	2.82%	3.55%	3.96%	2.49%	1.72%	2.19%	2.86%	3.02%	3.27%	3.19%	2.63%	3.05%

Drawdowns

CASY vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASY drawdown since its inception was -74.32%, which is greater than ADM's maximum drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASY and ADM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CASY	ADM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.32%	-68.01%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.47%	-13.32%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.64%	-54.14%	+30.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.41%	-54.14%	+20.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-17.41%	+17.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.20%	-21.63%	+6.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	4.65%	-1.42%

Volatility

CASY vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison

Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) have volatilities of 9.40% and 9.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CASY	ADM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.40%	9.85%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.32%	19.51%	-2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.84%	28.31%	-1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.04%	27.92%	-1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.41%	26.91%	+0.50%

Financials

CASY vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Casey's General Stores, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CASY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ADM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.59B and revenue of 18.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.

CASY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ADM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

CASY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 130.07M and revenue of 3.92B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

ADM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 456.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.