PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAS vs. CXSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAS vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CAS

1D
-0.49%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CXSE

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.93%
6M
0.61%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
-8.07%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAS vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAS and CXSE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.20

CAS vs. CXSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAS
CXSE

Financial Services

43.4%
6.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

26.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Industrials

-

16.6%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Technology

-

22.6%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Financial Services

CAS
43.4%
CXSE
6.2%

Basic Materials

CAS

-

CXSE
3.4%

Communication Services

CAS

-

CXSE
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CAS

-

CXSE
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

CAS

-

CXSE
3.9%

Energy

CAS

-

CXSE
0.4%

Healthcare

CAS

-

CXSE
8.8%

Industrials

CAS

-

CXSE
16.6%

Real Estate

CAS

-

CXSE
0.9%

Technology

CAS

-

CXSE
22.6%

Utilities

CAS

-

CXSE
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAS vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAS

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAS vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAS vs. CXSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CASCXSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-3.61

0.19

-3.80

Drawdowns

CAS vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum CXSE drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and CXSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASCXSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-70.01%

+67.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-46.01%

+44.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-27.83%

+26.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

Volatility

CAS vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASCXSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.83%

21.39%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

32.30%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

28.70%

-7.87%

CAS vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAS vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison

CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAS
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.99%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAS and CXSE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.32% for CXSE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAS and CXSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer