CAS vs. CXSE
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) are both China Equities funds. CAS is actively managed, while CXSE is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CXSE.
Performance
CAS vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXSE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- -8.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
CAS vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -1.66% |
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAS and CXSE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.20 |
CAS vs. CXSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAS
CXSE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CAS
CXSE
Basic Materials
CAS
-
CXSE
Communication Services
CAS
-
CXSE
Consumer Cyclical
CAS
-
CXSE
Consumer Defensive
CAS
-
CXSE
Energy
CAS
-
CXSE
Healthcare
CAS
-
CXSE
Industrials
CAS
-
CXSE
Real Estate
CAS
-
CXSE
Technology
CAS
-
CXSE
Utilities
CAS
-
CXSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank
CAS
CXSE
CAS vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAS | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -3.61 | 0.19 | -3.80 |
Drawdowns
CAS vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum CXSE drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and CXSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -70.01% | +67.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -46.01% | +44.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -27.83% | +26.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.42% | — |
Volatility
CAS vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.83% | 21.39% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 32.30% | -11.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 28.70% | -7.87% |
CAS vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison
CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.99% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAS and CXSE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.32% for CXSE.
Find the right allocation for CAS and CXSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer