PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAS vs. DRGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAS vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CAS

1D
-1.70%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRGN

1D
0.92%
1M
2.68%
YTD
17.63%
6M
19.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAS vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAS and DRGN is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAS vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAS vs. DRGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAS vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -5.11%, smaller than the maximum DRGN drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and DRGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASDRGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-20.86%

+15.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-6.19%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-8.05%

+4.89%

Volatility

CAS vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASDRGNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

35.00%

-21.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

35.00%

-21.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

35.00%

-21.49%

CAS vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAS vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAS and DRGN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.

CAS is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.39% for DRGN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAS and DRGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer