CARY vs. LQD
CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while LQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. CARY is actively managed, while LQD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARY returned 7.39%/yr vs 5.30%/yr for LQD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LQD.
Performance
CARY vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 0.82% return.
CARY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
CARY vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 2.01% | 7.54% | 6.93% | 8.70% | 0.58% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.82% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | 5.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARY and LQD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2022 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, CARY and LQD have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARY vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank
CARY
LQD
CARY vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARY | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.17 | +0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 1.55 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.04 | 4.37 | +17.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARY vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and LQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARY | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -24.95% | +22.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -3.34% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.96% | -8.43% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.37% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -3.99% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 1.19% | -0.89% |
Volatility
CARY vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) is 0.68%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that CARY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARY | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 1.78% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.37% | 4.02% | -2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80% | 5.37% | -3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 8.65% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 8.69% | -5.96% |
CARY vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARY vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than LQD's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 5.92% | 6.13% | 6.10% | 6.38% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARY and LQD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQD has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to CARY (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARY dropped -1.96% vs LQD's -24.95%.
On 3-year performance, CARY leads with 7.39% vs 5.30% for LQD. On fees, LQD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CARY has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CARY has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.
CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 4.55% for LQD.
CARY is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while LQD is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.15% for LQD.
CARY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARY and LQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer