PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARU vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARU vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -27.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 16.72% return.


CARU

1D
-3.38%
1M
-7.81%
6M
-26.28%
YTD
-27.45%
1Y
-15.02%
3Y*
-13.48%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.50%

SPUU

1D
1.52%
1M
0.24%
6M
14.02%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
23.82%
ALL TIME*
21.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.57K$33.91K$20.26K
$4.20M$4.55M$4.33M

CARU vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CARU
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
-27.45%7.29%23.44%-9.74%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
16.72%26.55%44.25%15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and SPUU is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.67

The correlation between CARU and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARU vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CARU
CARU Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CARU vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CARUSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.23

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

1.85

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

7.47

-8.14

CARU vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CARU vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARUSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-59.35%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.87%

-18.19%

-32.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.03%

-35.18%

-23.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.71%

-3.83%

-38.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.14%

-9.44%

-26.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.21%

4.51%

+23.70%

Volatility

CARU vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 23.56% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 7.10%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARUSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.56%

7.10%

+16.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.90%

20.38%

+34.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.83%

25.88%

+45.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.20%

33.70%

+46.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.20%

35.79%

+44.41%

CARU vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARU vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARU
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARU and SPUU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARU has higher volatility (23.56%) compared to SPUU (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 3-year performance, SPUU leads with 31.33% vs -13.48% for CARU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 7.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 31.33% return vs -13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARU.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.

CARU tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Max and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.60% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARU and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer