CARD vs. GDXD
Compare and contrast key facts about Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD).
CARD and GDXD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CARD is a passively managed fund by Max that tracks the performance of the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). It was launched on Jun 27, 2023. GDXD is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. Both CARD and GDXD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CARD vs. GDXD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CARD vs. GDXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 27.01% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -30.38% |
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.34% | -97.53% | -57.78% | -37.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly higher than GDXD's -51.34% return.
CARD
- 1D
- -10.04%
- 1M
- 20.30%
- YTD
- 27.01%
- 6M
- 23.34%
- 1Y
- -54.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXD
- 1D
- -21.63%
- 1M
- 68.00%
- YTD
- -51.34%
- 6M
- -76.21%
- 1Y
- -96.70%
- 3Y*
- -84.06%
- 5Y*
- -75.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CARD vs. GDXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CARD and GDXD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
CARD vs. GDXD — Risk / Return Rank
CARD
GDXD
CARD vs. GDXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | -0.70 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | -2.54 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.73 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.98 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -1.20 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | -0.70 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | -0.68 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CARD and GDXD is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CARD vs. GDXD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CARD nor GDXD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CARD vs. GDXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, smaller than the maximum GDXD drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and GDXD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | -99.96% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.41% | -98.51% | +21.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.46% | -99.93% | +9.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.62% | -70.92% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.55% | 80.64% | -15.09% |
Volatility
CARD vs. GDXD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) is 25.18%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a volatility of 54.68%. This indicates that CARD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CARD | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.18% | 54.68% | -29.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.70% | 110.83% | -58.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.47% | 138.20% | -55.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.97% | 108.13% | -27.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.97% | 108.21% | -27.24% |