PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARD vs. FTXR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARD vs. FTXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTXR's 14.58% return.


CARD

1D
1.10%
1M
-13.67%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
-35.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXR

1D
-0.02%
1M
11.32%
YTD
14.58%
6M
18.08%
1Y
43.09%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARD vs. FTXR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-2.60%-60.21%-58.19%-30.38%
FTXR
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
14.58%14.70%17.09%2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CARD and FTXR is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

-0.80

The correlation between CARD and FTXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARD vs. FTXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXR
FTXR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FTXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARD vs. FTXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARDFTXRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

1.99

-2.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.43

2.80

-3.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.33

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

2.99

-3.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

10.08

-11.13

CARD vs. FTXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARD Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the FTXR Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARD and FTXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARDFTXRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

1.99

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.65

0.40

-1.06

Drawdowns

CARD vs. FTXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, which is greater than FTXR's maximum drawdown of -52.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and FTXR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARDFTXRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.51%

-52.06%

-41.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.57%

-14.49%

-35.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.68%

-1.09%

-91.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.13%

-11.06%

-57.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.93%

4.29%

+29.64%

Volatility

CARD vs. FTXR - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 22.80% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) at 6.70%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARDFTXRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.80%

6.70%

+16.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.05%

16.48%

+33.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.70%

21.79%

+46.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.53%

23.85%

+56.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.53%

24.75%

+55.78%

CARD vs. FTXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARD vs. FTXR - Dividend Comparison

CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXR
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
1.14%1.52%2.13%1.50%2.38%0.67%0.33%1.34%1.74%1.18%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARD and FTXR have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARD has higher volatility (22.80%) compared to FTXR (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARD dropped -93.51% vs FTXR's -52.06%.

On 1-year performance, FTXR leads with 43.09% vs -35.78% for CARD. On fees, FTXR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTXR has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTXR has performed better with a 43.09% return vs -35.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARD.

FTXR has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.

CARD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FTXR is Industrials Equities. CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: Max and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARD and 0.60% for FTXR.

FTXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARD and FTXR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer