CAPE vs. INKM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAPE (iPath Shiller CAPE ETN) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CAPE is passively managed, while INKM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAPE returned 12.19%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for INKM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAPE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.

Performance

CAPE vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than INKM's 5.61% return.

CAPE

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.38%
• 1Y: 3.29%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INKM

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 6M: 5.74%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPE vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN	-1.70%	9.10%	14.40%	27.65%	-15.28%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	5.61%	11.86%	5.70%	10.26%	-10.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and INKM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.76

The correlation between CAPE and INKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAPE vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CAPE	INKM
Consumer Defensive	25.9%	8.6%
Communication Services	25.2%	6.2%
Healthcare	25.0%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	24.8%	5.1%
Real Estate	24.7%	10.9%
Financial Services	23.2%	8.3%
Basic Materials	22.0%	1.4%
Technology	0.2%	13.2%
Industrials	0.0%	14.6%
Energy	-	11.1%
Utilities	-	13.9%

Return for Risk

CAPE vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPE

CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 13
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 15

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 65
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPE vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAPE	INKM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	2.20	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	3.12	-2.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.42	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	2.87	-2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.24	11.30	-10.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAPE vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPE and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAPE	INKM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	2.20	-1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.57	-0.16

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and INKM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAPE	INKM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-28.58%	+6.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	-4.55%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.32%	-9.25%	-5.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-0.33%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-3.69%	-1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	1.15%	+1.50%

Volatility

CAPE vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.67%. This indicates that CAPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAPE	INKM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	1.67%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	4.59%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.89%	5.95%	+4.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.93%	8.30%	+8.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.93%	9.78%	+7.15%

CAPE vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAPE vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than INKM's 4.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN	1.41%	1.39%	1.23%	1.01%	0.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.86%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAPE and INKM in my portfolio?

CAPE and INKM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAPE or INKM?

CAPE has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs INKM's -28.58%.

Which ETF is better, CAPE or INKM?

On 3-year performance, CAPE leads with 12.19% vs 10.04% for INKM. On fees, CAPE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAPE or INKM?

Over the 3-year period, CAPE has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAPE or INKM?

CAPE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAPE or INKM?

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 1.41% for CAPE.

What is the main difference between CAPE and INKM?

They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CAPE and 0.50% for INKM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INKM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.