PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CANQ vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CANQ vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CANQ vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
-5.71%11.69%19.48%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
-4.59%18.82%17.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANQ achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's -4.59% return.


CANQ

1D
1.68%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-5.33%
1Y
9.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSX

1D
2.78%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-4.59%
6M
-2.72%
1Y
16.50%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CANQ vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANQ has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CANQ vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANQ
CANQ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CANQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CANQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANQ vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CANQNTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.90

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.54

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.03

6.64

-3.61

CANQ vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANQ and NTSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CANQNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.90

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.62

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CANQ and NTSX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CANQ vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than NTSX's 1.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
5.00%5.02%4.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.22%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Drawdowns

CANQ vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANQ drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANQ and NTSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CANQNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-31.34%

+18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-11.13%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-6.40%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-6.92%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.57%

+0.63%

Volatility

CANQ vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) is 3.72%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that CANQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CANQNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

6.11%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

9.65%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

18.39%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

17.04%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

18.39%

-5.66%