NTSX vs. AVUV
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 10.08%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for AVUV. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
NTSX vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.12% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 6M
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 39.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 9.77% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 6.99% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.12% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and AVUV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between NTSX and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
NTSX vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSX
AVUV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
NTSX
AVUV
Communication Services
NTSX
AVUV
Financial Services
NTSX
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
NTSX
AVUV
Healthcare
NTSX
AVUV
Industrials
NTSX
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
NTSX
AVUV
Energy
NTSX
AVUV
Utilities
NTSX
AVUV
Real Estate
NTSX
AVUV
Basic Materials
NTSX
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
AVUV
NTSX vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 2.29 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 3.26 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.99 | -1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | 14.84 | -1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.29 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -49.42% | +18.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -7.95% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -28.79% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -28.79% | -2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -7.96% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.67% | -0.60% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is 3.23%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that NTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 4.14% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 11.28% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 17.50% | -5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 22.73% | -5.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 28.30% | -10.03% |
NTSX vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSX vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than AVUV's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.06% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and AVUV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVUV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to NTSX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.93% vs 10.08% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.06% for NTSX.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer