PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CANQ vs. EAOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CANQ vs. EAOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CANQ vs. EAOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
-5.71%11.69%19.48%
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
-0.71%11.47%6.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANQ achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than EAOK's -0.71% return.


CANQ

1D
1.68%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-5.33%
1Y
9.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAOK

1D
1.12%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
0.92%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CANQ vs. EAOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANQ has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOK's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CANQ vs. EAOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANQ
CANQ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CANQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CANQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOK
EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANQ vs. EAOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CANQEAOKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.43

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

2.07

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.09

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.03

8.37

-5.34

CANQ vs. EAOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the EAOK Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANQ and EAOK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CANQEAOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.43

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.55

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between CANQ and EAOK is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CANQ vs. EAOK - Dividend Comparison

CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than EAOK's 3.24% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
5.00%5.02%4.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.24%3.18%3.15%2.80%2.27%1.19%1.00%

Drawdowns

CANQ vs. EAOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANQ drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum EAOK drawdown of -19.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANQ and EAOK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CANQEAOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-19.91%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-4.49%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-3.10%

-6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-5.15%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

1.12%

+2.08%

Volatility

CANQ vs. EAOK - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) at 2.87%. This indicates that CANQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CANQEAOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.87%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

4.01%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

6.50%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

6.99%

+5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

6.83%

+5.90%