CANE vs. XXRP
CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and XXRP (Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while XXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Teucrium. CANE is passively managed, while XXRP is actively managed. Over the past year, CANE returned -14.28% vs -90.09% for XXRP. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CANE charges 1.88%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for XXRP.
Performance
CANE vs. XXRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly higher than XXRP's -69.63% return.
CANE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- -10.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- -2.23%
XXRP
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -28.47%
- YTD
- -69.63%
- 6M
- -79.63%
- 1Y
- -90.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANE vs. XXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | -0.77% | -17.61% |
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | -69.63% | -56.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and XXRP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. XXRP — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
XXRP
CANE vs. XXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANE | XXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.87 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.95 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -1.26 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANE | XXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | -0.60 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | -0.57 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
CANE vs. XXRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, smaller than the maximum XXRP drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and XXRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | XXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -95.20% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -95.20% | +75.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.21% | -95.20% | +31.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.50% | -59.63% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 71.22% | -58.87% |
Volatility
CANE vs. XXRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) is 6.85%, while Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) has a volatility of 27.69%. This indicates that CANE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | XXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 27.69% | -20.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | 105.84% | -90.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 149.92% | -129.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 146.13% | -125.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 146.13% | -124.41% |
CANE vs. XXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is lower than XXRP's 1.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
CANE vs. XXRP - Dividend Comparison
CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | 21.50% | 6.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CANE and XXRP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XXRP has higher volatility (27.69%) compared to CANE (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs XXRP's -95.20%.
On 1-year performance, CANE leads with -14.28% vs -90.09% for XXRP. On fees, CANE is cheaper at 1.88% per year. On volatility, CANE has been the lower-risk option at 6.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CANE has performed better with a -14.28% return vs -90.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CANE is cheaper with a 1.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XXRP.
XXRP has the higher dividend yield at 21.50%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.
CANE is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while XXRP is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for CANE and 1.89% for XXRP.
XXRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANE and XXRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer