CANE vs. PDBA
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA).
CANE and PDBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. PDBA is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Aug 24, 2022.
Performance
CANE vs. PDBA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CANE vs. PDBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 7.02% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 6.60% |
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.26% | -0.76% | 34.16% | 7.83% | -1.60% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CANE having a 7.02% return and PDBA slightly higher at 7.26%.
CANE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 12.38%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -14.50%
- 3Y*
- -2.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 0.05%
PDBA
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CANE vs. PDBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. PDBA — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
PDBA
CANE vs. PDBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANE | PDBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | 0.61 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | 0.94 | -1.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.12 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.85 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 1.59 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANE | PDBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | 0.61 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.92 | -1.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and PDBA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CANE vs. PDBA - Dividend Comparison
CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.10% | 3.32% | 13.01% | 6.82% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
CANE vs. PDBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than PDBA's maximum drawdown of -12.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and PDBA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | PDBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -12.45% | -68.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.86% | -8.05% | -20.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.32% | 0.00% | -60.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -3.90% | -52.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.23% | 4.30% | +14.93% |
Volatility
CANE vs. PDBA - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) at 2.68%. This indicates that CANE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | PDBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 2.68% | +4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 6.72% | +7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 11.80% | +7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 13.35% | +7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 13.35% | +8.44% |