PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CANE vs. CORN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CANE vs. CORN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CANE vs. CORN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund
7.02%-14.65%-7.79%30.06%3.59%36.30%-3.85%-0.97%-27.52%-24.76%
CORN
Teucrium Corn Fund
3.78%-5.54%-12.98%-19.90%25.02%38.25%5.27%-7.79%-4.28%-10.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly higher than CORN's 3.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CANE has outperformed CORN with an annualized return of 0.05%, while CORN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.95% annualized return.


CANE

1D
-0.38%
1M
12.38%
YTD
7.02%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
-14.50%
3Y*
-2.83%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
0.05%

CORN

1D
0.60%
1M
2.85%
YTD
3.78%
6M
5.44%
1Y
-0.86%
3Y*
-9.99%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
-0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CANE vs. CORN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is lower than CORN's 2.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CANE vs. CORN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANE
CANE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CANE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CANE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CORN
CORN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CORN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CORN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CORN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CORN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CORN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANE vs. CORN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CANECORNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.75

-0.06

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.01

0.02

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.00

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.02

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-0.04

-0.76

CANE vs. CORN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANE Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the CORN Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANE and CORN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CANECORNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

-0.06

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.06

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

-0.05

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

-0.08

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CANE and CORN is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CANE vs. CORN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CANE nor CORN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CANE vs. CORN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, roughly equal to the maximum CORN drawdown of -78.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and CORN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CANECORNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-78.09%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.86%

-14.66%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.73%

-44.39%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.29%

-51.10%

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.32%

-65.07%

+4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.42%

-50.93%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.23%

9.11%

+10.12%

Volatility

CANE vs. CORN - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) at 5.59%. This indicates that CANE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CANECORNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

5.59%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

9.96%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

14.53%

+4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

21.07%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

19.51%

+2.28%