CANE vs. CORN
CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from Teucrium - CANE tracks the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark while CORN tracks the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CANE returned -2.23%/yr vs -2.61%/yr for CORN. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CANE charges 1.88%/yr vs 2.19%/yr for CORN.
Performance
CANE vs. CORN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly higher than CORN's -1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CANE has outperformed CORN with an annualized return of -2.23%, while CORN has yielded a comparatively lower -2.61% annualized return.
CANE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- -10.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- -2.23%
CORN
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- -4.06%
- 3Y*
- -9.83%
- 5Y*
- -3.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.61%
CANE vs. CORN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | -0.77% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 3.59% | 36.30% | -3.85% | -0.97% | -27.52% | -24.76% |
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | -1.47% | -5.54% | -12.98% | -19.90% | 25.02% | 38.25% | 5.27% | -7.79% | -4.28% | -10.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and CORN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2011 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. CORN — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
CORN
CANE vs. CORN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANE | CORN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.97 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.40 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -0.79 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANE | CORN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | -0.27 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | -0.20 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | -0.14 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | -0.09 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
CANE vs. CORN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, roughly equal to the maximum CORN drawdown of -78.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and CORN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | CORN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -78.09% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -10.26% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.73% | -38.57% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | -44.39% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | -51.10% | -16.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.21% | -66.83% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.50% | -51.08% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 5.18% | +7.17% |
Volatility
CANE vs. CORN - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) at 6.42%. This indicates that CANE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | CORN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 6.42% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | 11.50% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 15.40% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 20.21% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 19.40% | +2.32% |
CANE vs. CORN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is lower than CORN's 2.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CANE vs. CORN - Dividend Comparison
Neither CANE nor CORN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CANE and CORN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CANE has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to CORN (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs CORN's -78.09%.
On 10-year performance, CANE leads with -2.23% vs -2.61% for CORN. On fees, CANE is cheaper at 1.88% per year. On volatility, CORN has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CANE has performed better with a -2.23% return vs -2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CANE is cheaper with a 1.88% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.
CANE and CORN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CANE tracks Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while CORN tracks Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for CANE and 2.19% for CORN.
CORN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANE and CORN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer