CAMT vs. MINT
CAMT (Camtek Ltd.) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, CAMT returned 48.82%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for MINT. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CAMT vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 48.82%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.
CAMT
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 1Y
- 38.70%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 29.20%
- 10Y*
- 48.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.66%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | $71.36M | $73.47M | $86.04M |
| $141.60M | $159.28M | $155.81M |
CAMT vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 24.56% | 31.66% | 18.33% | 215.94% | -52.30% | 110.13% | 102.31% | 63.19% | 20.41% | 77.72% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 2.47% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAMT and MINT is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAMT vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
CAMT
MINT
CAMT vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAMT | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -50.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 14.85 | -13.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 90.98 | -89.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 703.66 | -700.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAMT vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAMT | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.71% | -4.62% | -93.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.80% | -0.05% | -38.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -0.16% | -63.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.16% | -2.42% | -60.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.16% | -4.62% | -58.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.15% | 0.00% | -36.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.55% | -0.17% | -55.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.47% | 0.01% | +14.46% |
Volatility
CAMT vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) has a higher volatility of 24.11% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.10%. This indicates that CAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAMT | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.11% | 0.10% | +24.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.30% | 0.22% | +56.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.56% | 0.28% | +69.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.22% | 0.58% | +56.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.78% | 0.94% | +51.84% |
Dividends
CAMT vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 3.84% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAMT and MINT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMT has higher volatility (24.11%) compared to MINT (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMT dropped -97.71% vs MINT's -4.62%.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.93 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAMT and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer