PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAML vs. QWLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAML vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAML achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 6.55% return.


CAML

1D
-0.86%
1M
4.12%
YTD
5.82%
6M
4.18%
1Y
15.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QWLD

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.55%
YTD
6.55%
6M
7.32%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAML vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
5.82%12.43%23.24%10.13%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
6.55%17.93%14.44%7.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CAML and QWLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023

0.79

The correlation between CAML and QWLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAML vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAML
QWLD

Technology

44.2%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
5.0%

Communication Services

9.5%
9.6%

Financial Services

8.6%
13.8%

Industrials

8.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

6.2%
12.6%

Utilities

3.4%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
7.6%

Energy

2.2%
4.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.9%

Technology

CAML
44.2%
QWLD
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CAML
9.9%
QWLD
5.0%

Communication Services

CAML
9.5%
QWLD
9.6%

Financial Services

CAML
8.6%
QWLD
13.8%

Industrials

CAML
8.2%
QWLD
8.6%

Healthcare

CAML
6.2%
QWLD
12.6%

Utilities

CAML
3.4%
QWLD
3.7%

Real Estate

CAML
2.4%
QWLD
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

CAML
2.3%
QWLD
7.6%

Energy

CAML
2.2%
QWLD
4.5%

Basic Materials

CAML
2.0%
QWLD
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAML vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAML
CAML Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CAML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAML Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAML Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CAML Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAML Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QWLD
QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAML vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAMLQWLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.24

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

9.70

-6.30

CAML vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAML Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAML and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAMLQWLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.77

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.69

+0.37

Drawdowns

CAML vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and QWLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMLQWLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-31.89%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-7.66%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.56%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-3.71%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

1.77%

+2.73%

Volatility

CAML vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.26%. This indicates that CAML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMLQWLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

2.26%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.35%

7.51%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

9.68%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

13.53%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

15.18%

+2.58%

CAML vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAML vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

CAML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.06%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
1.84%1.85%1.74%1.78%2.02%1.77%1.77%2.13%2.33%2.73%2.22%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAML and QWLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAML has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to QWLD (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAML dropped -21.06% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

On 1-year performance, QWLD leads with 17.09% vs 15.24% for CAML. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 17.09% return vs 15.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAML.

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for CAML.

They also come from different issuers: Congress and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAML and 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAML and QWLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer